Source
WHEN it is declared that the U. S.A. and Britain and other Nordic nations are Israelites and the chosen people of God, most of the modern lay churches call it false and without foundation, but refuse to give any Scriptures to prove that we are not. They put us on the defensive by demanding proof of our claims, and in response we give evidence from Scripture, history, ethnology and heraldry. As a reaction to the usual tactics of our opponents the order has been reversed and some questions presented for an answer:
Can those who disagree with us furnish evidence to prove that we are not Israel, and that the Jews are? No man's answer will suffice. The answer must come from
God's Word so that the issue may be clear.
The modern day church states that the Jew and Israel are one and the same; also that the U.S.A., Britain and other Nordic nations are Gentile (in the sense of heathen) nations. If their claim is true, and the Jews are Israel, THEY HAVE TO FULFIL EVERY SCRIPTURE WHICH GOD SAID ISRAELWOULD FULFIL:
So in answer to my critics in relation to my latest books "Who Am I?" I present the following questions relative to the above mentioned subject. All these questions emerge from reading God's Word and history.
1) Have the Jews blessed all the nations of the earth? Gen. 12:3; 22: 18.
2) Are the Jews circumcised in heart? Deut. 10:16; 30:6; Romans 2:28 and 29; Phil. 3:3; Col. 2:9-11.
3) Have the Jews ever glorified Christ and has He been recognized by the Jewish nation? Isa. 41:16; Luke 1:32 and 7:16.
4) Do the Jews declare that Christ is the Lord God of Israel of the old Testament? Isa. 43: 10 & 12; 44:8; 49:3-6; 52:6; and Acts 1:8.
5) Do the Jews show forth the praise of Jesus? Isa. 43:21
6) Have the Jews carried the gospel to all the world and witnessed for Jesus Christ and held the Bible open? Gen. 28: 14; Isa 43: 10; 44:21; and look at Isa.49:3,6 and Acts 1:8 again
7) Do the Jews have God's Spirit and the Word of God in their mouth and their uttermost being? Isa.59:21.
8) Was the New Covenant written only to the Jews? The Bible states that it was made with the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Jer. 31: 31-33; Heb. 8:8-10; Matt. 26:28.
9) Are the Jews the sheep of Israel? Ezek. 34:11,12; Psalm 78:52; 95:1,6,7; Isa. 53:6; John 10:22-27; Matt. 15:24.
10) Are the Jews the Children of God scattered abroad? St. John 7:35; 10:16 and 11:52.
11) Is Jesus Christ glorified in the Jews? Isa. 49:3; Romans 8:29,30; 11:1,2 and 9:4.
12) Are the Jews the servants of God? Isa. 41:8; 43:8 and 49:3.
13) Are the Jews a holy nation, a chosen generation, a royal priesthood, a peculiar people? Ex. 19:5,6; Deut. 14:2 and 7:6; 1 Peter 2:9,10; and 1:1,2.
14) Are the Jews the great characters mentioned in the great faith chapter of Hebrews 11? (Not one was a Jew.)
15) Are the Jews a "righteous nation?" Isaiah 26:2.
16) Are the Jews bringing forth the fruits of the kingdom? Hosea 14:8; Matt. 21:43.
17) Are the Jews kind to strangers? Lev. 19:33,34; Matt. 25:31-46.
18) Are the Jews called the "sons of the living God?" Hosea 1:10.
19) Do the Jews claim to be "not God's people? Hosea 1:10.
20) Do the Jews have all of God's Word? Deut. 33:4; Psalm 147:19&20; Romans 9:3-5.
21) Are the Jews a great and mighty nation? Genesis 18:18.
22) Are the Jews today innumerable as the stars of heaven and as the sand of the seashore? Gen. 22: 17; Hosea 1:10.
23) Do the Jews possess the gate of their enemies? Gen. 22:17; 24:60.
24) Are the Jews a nation and a company of Genesis 48 and 49,
25) Will the Jews push all the people together to the ends of the earth? Deut. 33:17.
26) Are the Jews above all the people on the face of the earth? Deut. 7:6; & 12:2; Psalm 135:4; Amos 3:2.
27) Have the Jews ever dwelt alone in a home appointed by God? Num. 23:9; 2 Sam. 7 :10; 1Chron. 17:9; Deut. 29:28; Jer: 16:13 & 3:18; Ezek. 36:24 and Acts 17:26.
28) Have the Jews a navy or naval power? Num. 24:7; Isa. 60:5,9,
29) Did or will the Jews eat up the nations, their enemies? Num. 24:8.
30) Are Jews God's battle axe? Num. 24:8,9; Isa. 41: 15,16; Jer. 51:20-23.
31) Are the Jews feared by all nations? Deut. 2:25; 28: 10.
32) Are the Jews a mighty nation, crushing and grinding to powder all who oppose them? Matt. 21:44 and Daniel 2:44.
33) Have the Jews inherited the gentiles? Isa. 54:3.
34) Is it possible to count 1/4 of the Jews, or all of them? Num. 23: 10.
35) Are the Jews the rod of God's inheritance? Ps. 135:4; Isa. 19:25.
36) Do the Jews today have an earthly king of the lineage of David ruling over them? If they are Israel then a Davidic king must be among them somewhere. Ps.89:27-29 & 35 to 37; Jer. 33: 17.
37) Are the Jews called today through Isaac? (Isaac's sons, or Saxons) Gen. 35:11; Amos 7:16; Romans 9:7 and Heb. 11:18.
38) Will the Jews say they have lost their lineage or identity? Hos. 1:9 & 10; 2:6; Isa. 1:3; 42:19; Deut. 32:26; Jer. 50:6,7; Hosea 8:8 and 9:17.
39) Do the Jews have a new name today? Isa. 62:2; 65:15; Hosea 1:10; Romans 9:25,26; 1 Pet.2:10; Acts 11:26.(New Language too -Isa. 28:11).
40) If the Jews are Israel how can the blessings promised to specific, and separate tribes in Genesis 48 and 49, and in Deut. 33 come about? Wouldn't they have to be separate nations? Note the time of fulfilment: Gen. 49:1. (Also 1 John 2:18; Acts 2:16,17; 1Peter 1:3, 5, 18 & 20; Jude 17-.19 and Hebrews 11:1 and 2)
41) Are the heathen nations aligned against the Jews only? Joel 3:9; and Psalms 83.
42) Are the Jews a hidden people? Psalm 83:4 and Isaiah 3:9
43) Are the Jews described nationally as a great lion? Gen. 49:9 and Numbers 23:24; 24:9.
44) Did the Jews deliver Jerusalem in 1917? See Luke 21:24; Hag. 2:18, 19 and 22; Lev. 26:18 to 28; Ezek 4:6; Rev.2:3 & 12:10-14.These refer to"times" predicted, and along with many more that are too long to be discussed in this addendum. However Daniel 12:11 & 12; Psalm 95:10; Heb. 3:9 & 10 and Matt. 24:34, are of interest of time element.
45) Are the Jews the house of Israel and the house of Judah-two nations and families? Ezek. & Jer. 3: 18; 31:31; 33:24.
46) Are the Jews called "Great?" Gen. 12:2.
47) Have the Jews released those in slavery? Isa. 42:7 & 58:6.
48) Have the Jews colonized any people? Isa. 35:1; 49:8; Gen. 28:14.
49) Are the Jews an Island people? Isa,. 24:14; 41:1; 43:4-10; 49:1,19; and Jer. 23:8; 31:10.
50) Do the Jews recognize Jesus as God? (God said Israel would: Isaiah 43:10,12; 52:6; Matthew 1:23; Luke1:68; 1 Timothy 3:16; Acts 3:14 and John 9:28
Of the fifty questions concerning the Jews - a people regarded by so many as "God's Chosen People." And with more than three times this many Bible references
to these questions I cannot find even one Scripture to substantiate the people's claim that: "the Jews are God's chosen people." Friend, can you???
So, in conclusion to the above subject I am going to offer a $1,000.00 reward to the first good man - ooops, I just remember that Jesus Christ told a young man once that "there was none good but God." (Matt. chapter nineteen.). So, I will try to make this "Reward" offer very plain:
"If any man or woman, boy or girl, of any race or religious or unreligious beliefs will dust off your old Bible, using the King James version that I have studied for many years, and show me from its pages, chapter and verse, where it states that the Jews are God's chosen people, then I will give the first one $2,000.00. (Two Thousand Dollars) This offer will expire the first day of the year 2003, unless you ask me for more time to study."
Perhaps your pastor or some other preacher that teaches and preaches that the Jews are God's Chosen people could help you locate chapter and verse from your Bible.Ask your Sunday School teaches where to locate this in your Bible.
We have no more giants of culture such as Shakespeare, Beethoven and Goethe. We have no more literature, music or art of any significance since the Jewish blight descended upon our people. Music has become like the screech of automobile horns; literature has become a repetitious description of human debauchery, and art - the trivial daubs of monkeys or their human imitators.
These things I have written, and I believe in the same spirit of that of John the Apostle as he wrote in 1st John the second chapter. And I will close with a quotation
from this Apostle as he wrote in the 5th chapter of 1 John, verse 19:
"And we know that we are of God, and the whole world lieth in wickedness."
And, with best wishes,
From an old ninety-one year old Israelite,
Saturday, February 27, 2010
Saturday, February 20, 2010
Quote of the Week
I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and I know the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan.
Revelation 2:9 (King James Version)
Revelation 2:9 (King James Version)
Friday, February 19, 2010
Neo-Con Bill O'reilly Supports Gun Control
In case you haven't seen the footage the Oathkeeper is referring to the 4 part video can be found here. I highly recommend watching it.
Timothy McVeigh's Manifesto
I explain herein why I bombed the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City. I explain this not for publicity, nor seeking to win an argument of right or wrong. I explain so that the record is clear as to my thinking and motivations in bombing a government installation.
I chose to bomb a federal building because such an action served more purposes than other options. Foremost, the bombing was a retaliatory strike; a counter attack, for the cumulative raids (and subsequent violence and damage) that federal agents had participated in over the preceding years (including, but not limited to, Waco.) From the formation of such units as the FBI's "Hostage Rescue" and other assault teams amongst federal agencies during the '80's; culminating in the Waco incident, federal actions grew increasingly militaristic and violent, to the point where at Waco, our government - like the Chinese - was deploying tanks against its own citizens.
Knowledge of these multiple and ever-more aggressive raids across the country constituted an identifiable pattern of conduct within and by the federal government and amongst its various agencies. (see enclosed) For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior. Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building. When an aggressor force continually launches attacks from a particular base of operation, it is sound military strategy to take the fight to the enemy.
Additionally, borrowing a page from U.S. foreign policy, I decided to send a message to a government that was becoming increasingly hostile, by bombing a government building and the government employees within that building who represent that government. Bombing the Murrah Federal Building was morally and strategically equivalent to the U.S. hitting a government building in Serbia, Iraq, or other nations. (see enclosed) Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this action as an acceptable option. From this perspective, what occurred in Oklahoma City was no different than what Americans rain on the heads of others all the time, and subsequently, my mindset was and is one of clinical detachment. (The bombing of the Murrah building was not personal , no more than when Air Force, Army, Navy, or Marine personnel bomb or launch cruise missiles against government installations and their personnel.)
I hope that this clarification amply addresses your question.
Sincerely,
Timothy J. McVeigh
I chose to bomb a federal building because such an action served more purposes than other options. Foremost, the bombing was a retaliatory strike; a counter attack, for the cumulative raids (and subsequent violence and damage) that federal agents had participated in over the preceding years (including, but not limited to, Waco.) From the formation of such units as the FBI's "Hostage Rescue" and other assault teams amongst federal agencies during the '80's; culminating in the Waco incident, federal actions grew increasingly militaristic and violent, to the point where at Waco, our government - like the Chinese - was deploying tanks against its own citizens.
Knowledge of these multiple and ever-more aggressive raids across the country constituted an identifiable pattern of conduct within and by the federal government and amongst its various agencies. (see enclosed) For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior. Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building. When an aggressor force continually launches attacks from a particular base of operation, it is sound military strategy to take the fight to the enemy.
Additionally, borrowing a page from U.S. foreign policy, I decided to send a message to a government that was becoming increasingly hostile, by bombing a government building and the government employees within that building who represent that government. Bombing the Murrah Federal Building was morally and strategically equivalent to the U.S. hitting a government building in Serbia, Iraq, or other nations. (see enclosed) Based on observations of the policies of my own government, I viewed this action as an acceptable option. From this perspective, what occurred in Oklahoma City was no different than what Americans rain on the heads of others all the time, and subsequently, my mindset was and is one of clinical detachment. (The bombing of the Murrah building was not personal , no more than when Air Force, Army, Navy, or Marine personnel bomb or launch cruise missiles against government installations and their personnel.)
I hope that this clarification amply addresses your question.
Sincerely,
Timothy J. McVeigh
Joe Stack's Manifesto
If you’re reading this, you’re no doubt asking yourself, “Why did this have to happen?” The simple truth is that it is complicated and has been coming for a long time. The writing process, started many months ago, was intended to be therapy in the face of the looming realization that there isn’t enough therapy in the world that can fix what is really broken. Needless to say, this rant could fill volumes with example after example if I would let it. I find the process of writing it frustrating, tedious, and probably pointless… especially given my gross inability to gracefully articulate my thoughts in light of the storm raging in my head. Exactly what is therapeutic about that I’m not sure, but desperate times call for desperate measures.
We are all taught as children that without laws there would be no society, only anarchy. Sadly, starting at early ages we in this country have been brainwashed to believe that, in return for our dedication and service, our government stands for justice for all. We are further brainwashed to believe that there is freedom in this place, and that we should be ready to lay our lives down for the noble principals represented by its founding fathers. Remember? One of these was “no taxation without representation”. I have spent the total years of my adulthood unlearning that crap from only a few years of my childhood. These days anyone who really stands up for that principal is promptly labeled a “crackpot”, traitor and worse.
While very few working people would say they haven’t had their fair share of taxes (as can I), in my lifetime I can say with a great degree of certainty that there has never been a politician cast a vote on any matter with the likes of me or my interests in mind. Nor, for that matter, are they the least bit interested in me or anything I have to say.
Why is it that a handful of thugs and plunderers can commit unthinkable atrocities (and in the case of the GM executives, for scores of years) and when it’s time for their gravy train to crash under the weight of their gluttony and overwhelming stupidity, the force of the full federal government has no difficulty coming to their aid within days if not hours? Yet at the same time, the joke we call the American medical system, including the drug and insurance companies, are murdering tens of thousands of people a year and stealing from the corpses and victims they cripple, and this country’s leaders don’t see this as important as bailing out a few of their vile, rich cronies. Yet, the political “representatives” (thieves, liars, and self-serving scumbags is far more accurate) have endless time to sit around for year after year and debate the state of the “terrible health care problem”. It’s clear they see no crisis as long as the dead people don’t get in the way of their corporate profits rolling in.
And justice? You’ve got to be kidding!
How can any rational individual explain that white elephant conundrum in the middle of our tax system and, indeed, our entire legal system? Here we have a system that is, by far, too complicated for the brightest of the master scholars to understand. Yet, it mercilessly “holds accountable” its victims, claiming that they’re responsible for fully complying with laws not even the experts understand. The law “requires” a signature on the bottom of a tax filing; yet no one can say truthfully that they understand what they are signing; if that’s not “duress” than what is. If this is not the measure of a totalitarian regime, nothing is.
How did I get here?
My introduction to the real American nightmare starts back in the early ‘80s. Unfortunately after more than 16 years of school, somewhere along the line I picked up the absurd, pompous notion that I could read and understand plain English. Some friends introduced me to a group of people who were having ‘tax code’ readings and discussions. In particular, zeroed in on a section relating to the wonderful “exemptions” that make institutions like the vulgar, corrupt Catholic Church so incredibly wealthy. We carefully studied the law (with the help of some of the “best”, high-paid, experienced tax lawyers in the business), and then began to do exactly what the “big boys” were doing (except that we weren’t steeling from our congregation or lying to the government about our massive profits in the name of God). We took a great deal of care to make it all visible, following all of the rules, exactly the way the law said it was to be done.
The intent of this exercise and our efforts was to bring about a much-needed re-evaluation of the laws that allow the monsters of organized religion to make such a mockery of people who earn an honest living. However, this is where I learned that there are two “interpretations” for every law; one for the very rich, and one for the rest of us… Oh, and the monsters are the very ones making and enforcing the laws; the inquisition is still alive and well today in this country.
That little lesson in patriotism cost me $40,000+, 10 years of my life, and set my retirement plans back to 0. It made me realize for the first time that I live in a country with an ideology that is based on a total and complete lie. It also made me realize, not only how naive I had been, but also the incredible stupidity of the American public; that they buy, hook, line, and sinker, the crap about their “freedom”… and that they continue to do so with eyes closed in the face of overwhelming evidence and all that keeps happening in front of them.
Before even having to make a shaky recovery from the sting of the first lesson on what justice really means in this country (around 1984 after making my way through engineering school and still another five years of “paying my dues”), I felt I finally had to take a chance of launching my dream of becoming an independent engineer.
On the subjects of engineers and dreams of independence, I should digress somewhat to say that I’m sure that I inherited the fascination for creative problem solving from my father. I realized this at a very young age.
The significance of independence, however, came much later during my early years of college; at the age of 18 or 19 when I was living on my own as student in an apartment in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. My neighbor was an elderly retired woman (80+ seemed ancient to me at that age) who was the widowed wife of a retired steel worker. Her husband had worked all his life in the steel mills of central Pennsylvania with promises from big business and the union that, for his 30 years of service, he would have a pension and medical care to look forward to in his retirement. Instead he was one of the thousands who got nothing because the incompetent mill management and corrupt union (not to mention the government) raided their pension funds and stole their retirement. All she had was social security to live on.
In retrospect, the situation was laughable because here I was living on peanut butter and bread (or Ritz crackers when I could afford to splurge) for months at a time. When I got to know this poor figure and heard her story I felt worse for her plight than for my own (I, after all, I thought I had everything to in front of me). I was genuinely appalled at one point, as we exchanged stories and commiserated with each other over our situations, when she in her grandmotherly fashion tried to convince me that I would be “healthier” eating cat food (like her) rather than trying to get all my substance from peanut butter and bread. I couldn’t quite go there, but the impression was made. I decided that I didn’t trust big business to take care of me, and that I would take responsibility for my own future and myself.
Return to the early ‘80s, and here I was off to a terrifying start as a ‘wet-behind-the-ears’ contract software engineer… and two years later, thanks to the fine backroom, midnight effort by the sleazy executives of Arthur Andersen (the very same folks who later brought us Enron and other such calamities) and an equally sleazy New York Senator (Patrick Moynihan), we saw the passage of 1986 tax reform act with its section 1706.
For you who are unfamiliar, here is the core text of the IRS Section 1706, defining the treatment of workers (such as contract engineers) for tax purposes. Visit this link for a conference committee report (http://www.synergistech.com/1706.shtml#ConferenceCommitteeReport) regarding the intended interpretation of Section 1706 and the relevant parts of Section 530, as amended. For information on how these laws affect technical services workers and their clients, read our discussion here (http://www.synergistech.com/ic-taxlaw.shtml).
SEC. 1706. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN TECHNICAL PERSONNEL.
(a) IN GENERAL – Section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection:
(d) EXCEPTION. – This section shall not apply in the case of an individual who pursuant to an arrangement between the taxpayer and another person, provides services for such other person as an engineer, designer, drafter, computer programmer, systems analyst, or other similarly skilled worker engaged in a similar line of work.
(b) EFFECTIVE DATE. – The amendment made by this section shall apply to remuneration paid and services rendered after December 31, 1986.
Note:
· “another person” is the client in the traditional job-shop relationship.
· “taxpayer” is the recruiter, broker, agency, or job shop.
· “individual”, “employee”, or “worker” is you.
Admittedly, you need to read the treatment to understand what it is saying but it’s not very complicated. The bottom line is that they may as well have put my name right in the text of section (d). Moreover, they could only have been more blunt if they would have came out and directly declared me a criminal and non-citizen slave. Twenty years later, I still can’t believe my eyes.
During 1987, I spent close to $5000 of my ‘pocket change’, and at least 1000 hours of my time writing, printing, and mailing to any senator, congressman, governor, or slug that might listen; none did, and they universally treated me as if I was wasting their time. I spent countless hours on the L.A. freeways driving to meetings and any and all of the disorganized professional groups who were attempting to mount a campaign against this atrocity. This, only to discover that our efforts were being easily derailed by a few moles from the brokers who were just beginning to enjoy the windfall from the new declaration of their “freedom”. Oh, and don’t forget, for all of the time I was spending on this, I was loosing income that I couldn’t bill clients.
After months of struggling it had clearly gotten to be a futile exercise. The best we could get for all of our trouble is a pronouncement from an IRS mouthpiece that they weren’t going to enforce that provision (read harass engineers and scientists). This immediately proved to be a lie, and the mere existence of the regulation began to have its impact on my bottom line; this, of course, was the intended effect.
Again, rewind my retirement plans back to 0 and shift them into idle. If I had any sense, I clearly should have left abandoned engineering and never looked back.
Instead I got busy working 100-hour workweeks. Then came the L.A. depression of the early 1990s. Our leaders decided that they didn’t need the all of those extra Air Force bases they had in Southern California, so they were closed; just like that. The result was economic devastation in the region that rivaled the widely publicized Texas S&L fiasco. However, because the government caused it, no one gave a shit about all of the young families who lost their homes or street after street of boarded up houses abandoned to the wealthy loan companies who received government funds to “shore up” their windfall. Again, I lost my retirement.
Years later, after weathering a divorce and the constant struggle trying to build some momentum with my business, I find myself once again beginning to finally pick up some speed. Then came the .COM bust and the 911 nightmare. Our leaders decided that all aircraft were grounded for what seemed like an eternity; and long after that, ‘special’ facilities like San Francisco were on security alert for months. This made access to my customers prohibitively expensive. Ironically, after what they had done the Government came to the aid of the airlines with billions of our tax dollars … as usual they left me to rot and die while they bailed out their rich, incompetent cronies WITH MY MONEY! After these events, there went my business but not quite yet all of my retirement and savings.
By this time, I’m thinking that it might be good for a change. Bye to California, I’ll try Austin for a while. So I moved, only to find out that this is a place with a highly inflated sense of self-importance and where damn little real engineering work is done. I’ve never experienced such a hard time finding work. The rates are 1/3 of what I was earning before the crash, because pay rates here are fixed by the three or four large companies in the area who are in collusion to drive down prices and wages… and this happens because the justice department is all on the take and doesn’t give a fuck about serving anyone or anything but themselves and their rich buddies.
To survive, I was forced to cannibalize my savings and retirement, the last of which was a small IRA. This came in a year with mammoth expenses and not a single dollar of income. I filed no return that year thinking that because I didn’t have any income there was no need. The sleazy government decided that they disagreed. But they didn’t notify me in time for me to launch a legal objection so when I attempted to get a protest filed with the court I was told I was no longer entitled to due process because the time to file ran out. Bend over for another $10,000 helping of justice.
So now we come to the present. After my experience with the CPA world, following the business crash I swore that I’d never enter another accountant’s office again. But here I am with a new marriage and a boatload of undocumented income, not to mention an expensive new business asset, a piano, which I had no idea how to handle. After considerable thought I decided that it would be irresponsible NOT to get professional help; a very big mistake.
When we received the forms back I was very optimistic that they were in order. I had taken all of the years information to Bill Ross, and he came back with results very similar to what I was expecting. Except that he had neglected to include the contents of Sheryl’s unreported income; $12,700 worth of it. To make matters worse, Ross knew all along this was missing and I didn’t have a clue until he pointed it out in the middle of the audit. By that time it had become brutally evident that he was representing himself and not me.
This left me stuck in the middle of this disaster trying to defend transactions that have no relationship to anything tax-related (at least the tax-related transactions were poorly documented). Things I never knew anything about and things my wife had no clue would ever matter to anyone. The end result is… well, just look around.
I remember reading about the stock market crash before the “great” depression and how there were wealthy bankers and businessmen jumping out of windows when they realized they screwed up and lost everything. Isn’t it ironic how far we’ve come in 60 years in this country that they now know how to fix that little economic problem; they just steal from the middle class (who doesn’t have any say in it, elections are a joke) to cover their asses and it’s “business-as-usual”. Now when the wealthy fuck up, the poor get to die for the mistakes… isn’t that a clever, tidy solution.
As government agencies go, the FAA is often justifiably referred to as a tombstone agency, though they are hardly alone. The recent presidential puppet GW Bush and his cronies in their eight years certainly reinforced for all of us that this criticism rings equally true for all of the government. Nothing changes unless there is a body count (unless it is in the interest of the wealthy sows at the government trough). In a government full of hypocrites from top to bottom, life is as cheap as their lies and their self-serving laws.
I know I’m hardly the first one to decide I have had all I can stand. It has always been a myth that people have stopped dying for their freedom in this country, and it isn’t limited to the blacks, and poor immigrants. I know there have been countless before me and there are sure to be as many after. But I also know that by not adding my body to the count, I insure nothing will change. I choose to not keep looking over my shoulder at “big brother” while he strips my carcass, I choose not to ignore what is going on all around me, I choose not to pretend that business as usual won’t continue; I have just had enough.
I can only hope that the numbers quickly get too big to be white washed and ignored that the American zombies wake up and revolt; it will take nothing less. I would only hope that by striking a nerve that stimulates the inevitable double standard, knee-jerk government reaction that results in more stupid draconian restrictions people wake up and begin to see the pompous political thugs and their mindless minions for what they are. Sadly, though I spent my entire life trying to believe it wasn’t so, but violence not only is the answer, it is the only answer. The cruel joke is that the really big chunks of shit at the top have known this all along and have been laughing, at and using this awareness against, fools like me all along.
I saw it written once that the definition of insanity is repeating the same process over and over and expecting the outcome to suddenly be different. I am finally ready to stop this insanity. Well, Mr. Big Brother IRS man, let’s try something different; take my pound of flesh and sleep well.
Sunday, February 14, 2010
Joint Chief Admiral Michael Mullen A Traitorous Prick
"We will operate all our forces to have a stable and secure Israel and for the people of Israel."
How much of our military budget does Israel pay? Zero, in fact we pay them billions of dollars a year for their military budget, yet the highest ranking man in the US Navy says ALL of our forces will work for the people of Israel? Do not think for a second that our government hasn't been hijacked. It has been hijacked at this highest echelons of power, our government is occupied by the Zionist Jews and they will plunder all of our resources for the sake of Israel. And why shouldn't they? Americans are to busy watching TV or complaining about Obama, or Bush, they are to damn ignorant to realize they are nothing but puppets.
http://dover.idf.il/IDF/English/News...10/02/1403.htm
The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff of the U.S military referred to Israel’s security and made it clear that the U.S. stands behind it. “Israel supports the policy that Obama leads. The Chief of the General Staff Gabi Ashkenazi made this clear to me in a meeting a few weeks ago. That does not mean we are not worried. We have appreciation for Israel and we can take care of its security.”
Additionally Admiral Mullen stressed that between Israel and the U.S. there is real cooperation. “This important relationship with Israel grows stronger every day,” he said. “We are close partners, since the establishment of the state. I am aware of the needs of Israel in every step. I’m here to understand the perspective of those who live here. I worry about the stability and the possibility for instability in the region. We will operate all our forces to have a stable and secure Israel and for the people of Israel.”
Mullen was also asked about the possibility that Israel would attack Iran, and he answered, “Israel’s sovereignty is important to us. We would not hurt Israel’s sovereignty or any other country’s. We worked hard in recent years to improve our abilities in different areas, here in Israel and elsewhere in the region, including the Persian Gulf. Improving capabilities is not a response, but collaboration – all the improvements are only defensive.”
Saturday, February 13, 2010
A Question For Glenn Beck
Source
Glenn:
Glenn:
I’m under the impression that you consider the science behind global warming to be inaccurate, and that the efforts to promote it include hiding truth. A grand conspiracy, of sorts. On your TV show in November, 2009, you said:
Count them. There’s Jones, Mike, Keith, Gene and Caspar, whoever they are. Potentially deleting emails supposedly about supposed science. So why all the secrecy?
You went on:
“Deleting emails. Hiding declines. Incorrect Data. Inadequate systems. Redefining scientific peer reviews for their own uses. This is what appears to be going on behind the scenes. And literally trillions of dollars of policy decisions are being based on what these guys are telling us. If your gut said “wait a minute, this global warming thing, it sounds like a scam” – well, I think you’re seeing it now”
The whole story sounds like a massive conspiracy to give the government an excuse to pass cap and trade, to impose restrictions on business and individual choice, to aggrandize themselves with more money and power. It wouldn’t really surprise me.
That is what government does in the United States. In fact, it’s things like this that made me realize that neither Democrats or Republicans in D.C. had any respect for your freedom or for the Constitution. That was a driving force behind launching the Tenth Amendment Center, which I founded in mid-2006.
But, you know what? I’m not a detective, and I don’t have time to study the science, the clues, the mystery behind global warming or the global warming swindle as many people call it. So, if you had me on your TV show (sorry I wasn’t available when your producers asked last year, but I think my recommendation for a substitute worked out great!), and asked me:
“Michael – do you believe in this global warming scam, do you believe what the mainstream scientists are telling us about global warming – yes or no!?”
I’d have to answer this way:
“I’ve heard a lot of reports from reputable people on both sides of that issue. There are some very good arguments, and I think the American people have not seen all of the evidence there, so I have not taken a position on that. What I do know is this, I don’t trust the government to tell me the truth.”
In response, would you then say that you’re “writing me off” and “writing the Tenth Amendment Center off” because I haven’t taken a position on this – and that a better source for state sovereignty information is now the Huffington Post?”
Well, that’s basically what you did with Debra Medina on your program this week. The one person in the Texas campaign who’s had the courage to speak out about the Constitution, about nullification and interposition, about the founders, about the principles of liberty that this country was founded upon. That one person is “written off” by you because she hasn’t “taken a position on” a conspiracy theory that may or may not be of interest to her or her campaign?
Wow. Obviously the Constitution isn’t very important to you. A person’s stance on a conspiracy theory is. Or maybe this is just your way of trying to marginalize one of the few candidates in the entire country running their whole campaign on the original view of the Constitution.
Is that it, Glenn? Because it sure seems that way.
Maybe the real conspiracy isn’t 9-11 or Global Warming or anything of the sort. Maybe it’s all about the establishment media, and people like yourself – is this your way of letting the hardcore constitutionalists out here know that you really prefer the establishment candidates?
What should be more important is a person’s stance on the Constitution. In fact, that’s ALL that voters should care about. Not their race, their background, their religious views, their positions on conspiracies or anything else. People are elected to follow the constitution – and nothing more.
What’s more important to you, Glenn – a person’s stance on the Constitution or their view of a conspiracy theory?
Don’t bother answering. You already have.
Michael Boldin is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Is Limited Government An Oxymoron?
Doug Casey and Tom Woods take on the subject of government and it's role in society. It is a fascinating interview by two very astute scholars as they ask the question, is government even necessary?
Economics 101 With Tom Woods
This is a speech Tom Woods gave to high school students on behalf of the Mises Institute. It is really a good speech and it clearly lays out some basics of Austrian economic thought. It is a worthwhile video to watch especially if you are new to economics or have been bored by the subject in the past.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Screw The Census!
Source
San Francisco, 1980.
A friend drops by my house. He is a middle-level Democratic Party activist who has been appointed as a middle-level census supervisor. He lights up a joint. As he passes it to me, he explains that he is "working" at that very moment counting people for the census. "I don't understand. I thought the counting was over." He explains that he is doing "spot counts" of people who were not counted in the regular tallies. I ask him how he knows whether someone has already been counted.
"Well, we can ask, but usually we just make a judgment call. For example, I just saw 5,000 Hispanics on a bus who I am sure had not been counted." He went on to explain the benefits of systematic overcounting. "We get more money for government programs and more representation in Congress." I asked him how pervasive this was in the census system. He told me that it was virtually policy, at least in San Francisco. He went on to explain that, according to some estimates, there were actually 50,000 less people living in San Francisco than the number used to figure money and apportionment. I told him that I had not been counted, since I had burned my census form at a protest on the steps of the Federal Building. He said, "You are Now!" We continued to smoke and he continued to count imaginary people as the numbers on the budget continued to mount up.
The census is the largest remnant of the spoils system remaining in the federal government. All high-level census officials are chosen by the White House. Middle- and lower-level officials are chosen by Congressional offices. While some lower-level employees are chosen out of the pool who apply, rest assured that any ruling party hack who wants a job gets one.
A close friend of mine applied for a census job last year, when they were doing the initial "scouting." She got a 94 on the test, which is clearly excellent. She made several calls but wasn't given a job.
Last month, she called again and reactivated her application and test score. After many calls, she finally got a supervisor who explained that she would be hired, "if a neighborhood supervisor chose her." She asked if this was totally up to the neighborhood supervisors, she said that it was. Her next call was to her Congressthing. She was able to speak to one of the Congressional staffers who, coincidentally, earned extra income as the local census supervisor. The next day she was hired.
It is clear to me that the census isn't a little bit corrupt – it is a total scam. I would not be surprised if there are 50 million less people in the country, although it may not be that much less. It is clearly to the advantage of the people running the census (political hacks and officeholders) to pad the numbers as much as possible. It is illogical to expect them not to cheat.
Given what I know, I now look at the census advertisements in a different light. What I hear now is, "remember to fill out your census early and often and with big numbers. It is our future."
I would never want to advocate breaking the census laws, but consider the stakes. Our only defense against this gross inflation of the numbers is to deflate them. The following are not recommendations, just observations of actions that people wanting to deflate the numbers would take:
* If there are 4 people living at your house, some people might forget about the others.
* If someone doesn't fill out their form the worst they can do is fine them $100 (a rarity). When the follow-up people come to someone's door, they may accidentally say that they are asleep but live alone and goodbye. Under census procedures, this would result in a count of one and no return visit.
* Some people just leave a note on their door saying they live alone and don't bother me, I have tuberculosis (or some other virulent disease).
* Some people invite the census-taker in and offer some Great Spotted Suck Toad Soup.
* Some people answer the door in their Hannibal Lecter costume.
I am not going to answer and am willing to pay the $100. But my first plea will be self-defense.
San Francisco, 1980.
A friend drops by my house. He is a middle-level Democratic Party activist who has been appointed as a middle-level census supervisor. He lights up a joint. As he passes it to me, he explains that he is "working" at that very moment counting people for the census. "I don't understand. I thought the counting was over." He explains that he is doing "spot counts" of people who were not counted in the regular tallies. I ask him how he knows whether someone has already been counted.
"Well, we can ask, but usually we just make a judgment call. For example, I just saw 5,000 Hispanics on a bus who I am sure had not been counted." He went on to explain the benefits of systematic overcounting. "We get more money for government programs and more representation in Congress." I asked him how pervasive this was in the census system. He told me that it was virtually policy, at least in San Francisco. He went on to explain that, according to some estimates, there were actually 50,000 less people living in San Francisco than the number used to figure money and apportionment. I told him that I had not been counted, since I had burned my census form at a protest on the steps of the Federal Building. He said, "You are Now!" We continued to smoke and he continued to count imaginary people as the numbers on the budget continued to mount up.
The census is the largest remnant of the spoils system remaining in the federal government. All high-level census officials are chosen by the White House. Middle- and lower-level officials are chosen by Congressional offices. While some lower-level employees are chosen out of the pool who apply, rest assured that any ruling party hack who wants a job gets one.
A close friend of mine applied for a census job last year, when they were doing the initial "scouting." She got a 94 on the test, which is clearly excellent. She made several calls but wasn't given a job.
Last month, she called again and reactivated her application and test score. After many calls, she finally got a supervisor who explained that she would be hired, "if a neighborhood supervisor chose her." She asked if this was totally up to the neighborhood supervisors, she said that it was. Her next call was to her Congressthing. She was able to speak to one of the Congressional staffers who, coincidentally, earned extra income as the local census supervisor. The next day she was hired.
It is clear to me that the census isn't a little bit corrupt – it is a total scam. I would not be surprised if there are 50 million less people in the country, although it may not be that much less. It is clearly to the advantage of the people running the census (political hacks and officeholders) to pad the numbers as much as possible. It is illogical to expect them not to cheat.
Given what I know, I now look at the census advertisements in a different light. What I hear now is, "remember to fill out your census early and often and with big numbers. It is our future."
I would never want to advocate breaking the census laws, but consider the stakes. Our only defense against this gross inflation of the numbers is to deflate them. The following are not recommendations, just observations of actions that people wanting to deflate the numbers would take:
* If there are 4 people living at your house, some people might forget about the others.
* If someone doesn't fill out their form the worst they can do is fine them $100 (a rarity). When the follow-up people come to someone's door, they may accidentally say that they are asleep but live alone and goodbye. Under census procedures, this would result in a count of one and no return visit.
* Some people just leave a note on their door saying they live alone and don't bother me, I have tuberculosis (or some other virulent disease).
* Some people invite the census-taker in and offer some Great Spotted Suck Toad Soup.
* Some people answer the door in their Hannibal Lecter costume.
I am not going to answer and am willing to pay the $100. But my first plea will be self-defense.
Screw The Census!
Source
San Francisco, 1980.
A friend drops by my house. He is a middle-level Democratic Party activist who has been appointed as a middle-level census supervisor. He lights up a joint. As he passes it to me, he explains that he is "working" at that very moment counting people for the census. "I don't understand. I thought the counting was over." He explains that he is doing "spot counts" of people who were not counted in the regular tallies. I ask him how he knows whether someone has already been counted.
"Well, we can ask, but usually we just make a judgment call. For example, I just saw 5,000 Hispanics on a bus who I am sure had not been counted." He went on to explain the benefits of systematic overcounting. "We get more money for government programs and more representation in Congress." I asked him how pervasive this was in the census system. He told me that it was virtually policy, at least in San Francisco. He went on to explain that, according to some estimates, there were actually 50,000 less people living in San Francisco than the number used to figure money and apportionment. I told him that I had not been counted, since I had burned my census form at a protest on the steps of the Federal Building. He said, "You are Now!" We continued to smoke and he continued to count imaginary people as the numbers on the budget continued to mount up.
The census is the largest remnant of the spoils system remaining in the federal government. All high-level census officials are chosen by the White House. Middle- and lower-level officials are chosen by Congressional offices. While some lower-level employees are chosen out of the pool who apply, rest assured that any ruling party hack who wants a job gets one.
A close friend of mine applied for a census job last year, when they were doing the initial "scouting." She got a 94 on the test, which is clearly excellent. She made several calls but wasn't given a job.
Last month, she called again and reactivated her application and test score. After many calls, she finally got a supervisor who explained that she would be hired, "if a neighborhood supervisor chose her." She asked if this was totally up to the neighborhood supervisors, she said that it was. Her next call was to her Congressthing. She was able to speak to one of the Congressional staffers who, coincidentally, earned extra income as the local census supervisor. The next day she was hired.
It is clear to me that the census isn't a little bit corrupt – it is a total scam. I would not be surprised if there are 50 million less people in the country, although it may not be that much less. It is clearly to the advantage of the people running the census (political hacks and officeholders) to pad the numbers as much as possible. It is illogical to expect them not to cheat.
Given what I know, I now look at the census advertisements in a different light. What I hear now is, "remember to fill out your census early and often and with big numbers. It is our future."
I would never want to advocate breaking the census laws, but consider the stakes. Our only defense against this gross inflation of the numbers is to deflate them. The following are not recommendations, just observations of actions that people wanting to deflate the numbers would take:
* If there are 4 people living at your house, some people might forget about the others.
* If someone doesn't fill out their form the worst they can do is fine them $100 (a rarity). When the follow-up people come to someone's door, they may accidentally say that they are asleep but live alone and goodbye. Under census procedures, this would result in a count of one and no return visit.
* Some people just leave a note on their door saying they live alone and don't bother me, I have tuberculosis (or some other virulent disease).
* Some people invite the census-taker in and offer some Great Spotted Suck Toad Soup.
* Some people answer the door in their Hannibal Lecter costume.
I am not going to answer and am willing to pay the $100. But my first plea will be self-defense.
San Francisco, 1980.
A friend drops by my house. He is a middle-level Democratic Party activist who has been appointed as a middle-level census supervisor. He lights up a joint. As he passes it to me, he explains that he is "working" at that very moment counting people for the census. "I don't understand. I thought the counting was over." He explains that he is doing "spot counts" of people who were not counted in the regular tallies. I ask him how he knows whether someone has already been counted.
"Well, we can ask, but usually we just make a judgment call. For example, I just saw 5,000 Hispanics on a bus who I am sure had not been counted." He went on to explain the benefits of systematic overcounting. "We get more money for government programs and more representation in Congress." I asked him how pervasive this was in the census system. He told me that it was virtually policy, at least in San Francisco. He went on to explain that, according to some estimates, there were actually 50,000 less people living in San Francisco than the number used to figure money and apportionment. I told him that I had not been counted, since I had burned my census form at a protest on the steps of the Federal Building. He said, "You are Now!" We continued to smoke and he continued to count imaginary people as the numbers on the budget continued to mount up.
The census is the largest remnant of the spoils system remaining in the federal government. All high-level census officials are chosen by the White House. Middle- and lower-level officials are chosen by Congressional offices. While some lower-level employees are chosen out of the pool who apply, rest assured that any ruling party hack who wants a job gets one.
A close friend of mine applied for a census job last year, when they were doing the initial "scouting." She got a 94 on the test, which is clearly excellent. She made several calls but wasn't given a job.
Last month, she called again and reactivated her application and test score. After many calls, she finally got a supervisor who explained that she would be hired, "if a neighborhood supervisor chose her." She asked if this was totally up to the neighborhood supervisors, she said that it was. Her next call was to her Congressthing. She was able to speak to one of the Congressional staffers who, coincidentally, earned extra income as the local census supervisor. The next day she was hired.
It is clear to me that the census isn't a little bit corrupt – it is a total scam. I would not be surprised if there are 50 million less people in the country, although it may not be that much less. It is clearly to the advantage of the people running the census (political hacks and officeholders) to pad the numbers as much as possible. It is illogical to expect them not to cheat.
Given what I know, I now look at the census advertisements in a different light. What I hear now is, "remember to fill out your census early and often and with big numbers. It is our future."
I would never want to advocate breaking the census laws, but consider the stakes. Our only defense against this gross inflation of the numbers is to deflate them. The following are not recommendations, just observations of actions that people wanting to deflate the numbers would take:
* If there are 4 people living at your house, some people might forget about the others.
* If someone doesn't fill out their form the worst they can do is fine them $100 (a rarity). When the follow-up people come to someone's door, they may accidentally say that they are asleep but live alone and goodbye. Under census procedures, this would result in a count of one and no return visit.
* Some people just leave a note on their door saying they live alone and don't bother me, I have tuberculosis (or some other virulent disease).
* Some people invite the census-taker in and offer some Great Spotted Suck Toad Soup.
* Some people answer the door in their Hannibal Lecter costume.
I am not going to answer and am willing to pay the $100. But my first plea will be self-defense.
Question: How Bad Does Detroit Suck
Answer: Pretty damn bad.
Question: Why does Detroit suck?
Answer: Here
You don't agree with my first answer? Then watch these videos.
Question: Why does Detroit suck?
Answer: Here
You don't agree with my first answer? Then watch these videos.
Ask Yourself.
The United States of America was founded by White men. This is an indisputable fact. Do you think this country would have started with the same small government principles insuring personal freedom if it were founded by another group of people? Would we have enjoyed 200 years of such robust growth the likes of which the world has never seen, just due to the blueprint laid out by these men, if it were another group who laid the foundation?
Undoubtedly if these United States had been founded by blacks, asians, jews or spaniards our country would be very different than it is today.
So why do you think we can import untold amounts of these other races and cultures into our once homogeneous society, and have the core of America not be effected?
Look at a city like Detroit today to see a microcosm of America. You have a city that became world renowned, a beautiful city that's produced motor vehicles, a symbol throughout the world of the US's industrial strength, today it might as well be in ruins, pictures look more like war torn Baghdad than what was once a great American city.
The demographics changed, and there went the city.
Our demographics have changed, and there goes our nation.
Undoubtedly if these United States had been founded by blacks, asians, jews or spaniards our country would be very different than it is today.
So why do you think we can import untold amounts of these other races and cultures into our once homogeneous society, and have the core of America not be effected?
Look at a city like Detroit today to see a microcosm of America. You have a city that became world renowned, a beautiful city that's produced motor vehicles, a symbol throughout the world of the US's industrial strength, today it might as well be in ruins, pictures look more like war torn Baghdad than what was once a great American city.
The demographics changed, and there went the city.
Our demographics have changed, and there goes our nation.
Monday, February 8, 2010
John Murtha Dead
Looks like these marxist SOB's are being taken care of for us!
I'm sure over the next week the "news" outlets will be talking about his great and wonderful life, but I want everyone to remember this.
I'm sure over the next week the "news" outlets will be talking about his great and wonderful life, but I want everyone to remember this.
Sunday, February 7, 2010
Quote Of The Week
"The federal government is sending each of us a $600 rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, the money goes to China. If we spend it on gasoline it goes to the Arabs. If we buy a computer it will go to India. If we purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras and Guatemala. If we purchase a good car it will go to Germany. If we purchase useless crap it will go to Taiwan and none of it will help the American economy. The only way to keep that money here at home is to spend it on prostitutes and beer, since these are the only products still produced in US. I've been doing my part."
Marc Faber
Marc Faber
Saturday, February 6, 2010
The Case For Prepping
For the last several years I have strived to point out the warning signs of what I consider an imminent economic collapse. I have posted a myriad of articles and stories to support my beliefs. I'm not sure how vast an economic collapse we will face but regardless I think preparing for such a scenario to be very prudent.
I was discussing the topic of societal breakdown with a good friend the other day. I mentioned to him my thoughts about the situation to which he replied that he "didn't think it was all that likely" Granted my friend doesn't have internet and isn't aware of the stories on websites such as this, however I think his sentiments reflect those of most mainstream people.
This is my case for preps, having read all the articles on this blog (and many more) I do think that any number of scenarios could play out in which we find our way of life interrupted on one level or another. Here are several examples off the top of my head.
1. 10% of the entire population of America is on food stamps. This means that 1 in every 10 people you see relies on the government to provide him his food. Now if 10% actually receive food stamps, how many really depend on them to eat? 15-20% of the population? So what happens when there is a disruption in the chain for whatever reason and this man doesn't have the government money to purchase food? Do you think he will sit with his family in his home and just slowly starve? Of course not 10% of the population will look for other ways to find food, by any means necessary.
2. At anytime a natural disaster can hit, hurricane, tornados, wildfires, earthquakes etc. This can have many ramifications depending on the area of the country effected, if it hits the midwest you can have food shortages, if it hits a port city, it shuts down imports you get the idea. As we have already seen it doesn't take much for people to go on a looting spree, and the police have already proven they will go door to door collecting firearms.
You also have terrorist attacks (false flags), riots, all of which will lead to a breakdown in civilization as we know it. The degree of which will vary depending on the situation but regardless it is imperative that you prepare.
I'm not going to go into great detail about what you need to keep on hand, that varies from person to person and by region. You can easily begin to make a mental list of things you use on a daily basis and begin stocking these things.
I am very big on win win situations and to me prepping is exactly that. On one hand if you stock up on things you use regularly and nothing happens then you rotate your stock and your not out anything. In fact you may save money, less trips to the store, avoid price increases etc. Then if some undesirable scenario does play out where you have to rely on the things you have stockpiled your very life may be saved due to your prudence. These are both wins.
Consider the worst case scenario I can think of. You buy all of your supplies and NOTHING happens, and you don't rotate your stock and everything goes bad. This would be bad as you may lose several hundred dollars worth of food and other perishables. But how bad is it really? Many of us spend 1000 dollars a year on home insurance in case our homes burn down and what are they odds of that (not to high or insurance companies wouldnt make money)? This is money that you can never get back, but it might save you hundreds of thousands in the cost of repairing or rebuilding your home, and you do this without expecting to get the money back.
So why should stock piling supplies be viewed any differently? You should view stock piling like insurance, you may never use it, but it may save you money and in the case of preps your very life. To me it makes far more sense to take steps to insure your very life than it does physical possessions.
If you are interested in prepping I highly recommend thesurvivalblog.com to get you started.
I was discussing the topic of societal breakdown with a good friend the other day. I mentioned to him my thoughts about the situation to which he replied that he "didn't think it was all that likely" Granted my friend doesn't have internet and isn't aware of the stories on websites such as this, however I think his sentiments reflect those of most mainstream people.
This is my case for preps, having read all the articles on this blog (and many more) I do think that any number of scenarios could play out in which we find our way of life interrupted on one level or another. Here are several examples off the top of my head.
1. 10% of the entire population of America is on food stamps. This means that 1 in every 10 people you see relies on the government to provide him his food. Now if 10% actually receive food stamps, how many really depend on them to eat? 15-20% of the population? So what happens when there is a disruption in the chain for whatever reason and this man doesn't have the government money to purchase food? Do you think he will sit with his family in his home and just slowly starve? Of course not 10% of the population will look for other ways to find food, by any means necessary.
2. At anytime a natural disaster can hit, hurricane, tornados, wildfires, earthquakes etc. This can have many ramifications depending on the area of the country effected, if it hits the midwest you can have food shortages, if it hits a port city, it shuts down imports you get the idea. As we have already seen it doesn't take much for people to go on a looting spree, and the police have already proven they will go door to door collecting firearms.
You also have terrorist attacks (false flags), riots, all of which will lead to a breakdown in civilization as we know it. The degree of which will vary depending on the situation but regardless it is imperative that you prepare.
I'm not going to go into great detail about what you need to keep on hand, that varies from person to person and by region. You can easily begin to make a mental list of things you use on a daily basis and begin stocking these things.
I am very big on win win situations and to me prepping is exactly that. On one hand if you stock up on things you use regularly and nothing happens then you rotate your stock and your not out anything. In fact you may save money, less trips to the store, avoid price increases etc. Then if some undesirable scenario does play out where you have to rely on the things you have stockpiled your very life may be saved due to your prudence. These are both wins.
Consider the worst case scenario I can think of. You buy all of your supplies and NOTHING happens, and you don't rotate your stock and everything goes bad. This would be bad as you may lose several hundred dollars worth of food and other perishables. But how bad is it really? Many of us spend 1000 dollars a year on home insurance in case our homes burn down and what are they odds of that (not to high or insurance companies wouldnt make money)? This is money that you can never get back, but it might save you hundreds of thousands in the cost of repairing or rebuilding your home, and you do this without expecting to get the money back.
So why should stock piling supplies be viewed any differently? You should view stock piling like insurance, you may never use it, but it may save you money and in the case of preps your very life. To me it makes far more sense to take steps to insure your very life than it does physical possessions.
If you are interested in prepping I highly recommend thesurvivalblog.com to get you started.
Thursday, February 4, 2010
Tuesday, February 2, 2010
Alex Jones Is An Asshole
We already knew he was a shill for the jews, but I had no idea how big of an asshole he really was.
This is the initial video from the Austin 2nd Amendment Rally
This is the video of the pompous ass.
This is the initial video from the Austin 2nd Amendment Rally
This is the video of the pompous ass.
Monday, February 1, 2010
Obama Bows Again
At least the nigger know his place :)
In case you missed the other times Obama has bowed check out this link.
In case you missed the other times Obama has bowed check out this link.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)