It is no secret and should be a well established fact by now if you follow Truth In Our Time that Jews HATE Jesus Christ. They do anything in their power to detract from him at every available point. Something I wasn't aware of until recently was the amount of Christmas music that was written by Jews. The partial list can be found here.
On the outside this may seem innocent, however anyone who has studied the Jews and their methods know otherwise. We are, and I guess technically always have been, engaged in a War of Ideas. This War is waged on all fronts, language being a primary target of the enemy. If they can mold our language even a small amount we will have no means in which to fight them.
To keep on topic however Jews detest Christ and they detest the fact that he has been a dominate figure the world around since the time of his birth. So what better way to make everyone forget about him than to quit mentioning his name at CHRISTmas time. You now have X-Mas and a plethora of Christmas tunes that have nothing to do with Christ himself. It is very sad and quite dangerous when you stop and think about it. This may not effect you because you most likely were raised in a different time, but your kids who grow up in Govenment run endoctrination centers will never hear mention of Christ. Score one for the "chosen" people.
Thursday, December 25, 2008
Thursday, December 11, 2008
Truth About Jesse Jackson Jr. (Senate Candidate #5)
Chicago Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr., D-Ill., is the anonymous “Senate Candidate No. 5” whose emissaries Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich reportedly offered up to $1 million to name him to the U.S. Senate, federal law enforcement sources tell ABC News.
According to the FBI affidavit in the case, Blagojevich “stated he might be able to cut a deal with Senate Candidate 5 that provided Rod Blagojevich” with something “tangible up front.”
Jackson said this morning he was contacted Tuesday by federal prosecutors in Chicago whom he said “asked me to come in and share with them my insights and thoughts about the selection process.”
Jackson said, “I don’t know” when asked whether he was Candidate No. 5, but said he was told “I am not a target of this investigation.”
Jackson said he agreed to talk with federal investigators “as quickly as possible” after he consulted with a lawyer.
The congressman, a son of the famed civil rights leader, denied that anyone had been authorized to make payments or promises to the governor on his behalf.
According to the [FBI] affidavit, Blagojevich threatened to appoint Senate Candidate No. 5 if President-elect Obama refused to help get his wife on “paid corporate boards right now.”
The FBI says that during an Oct. 31 conversation, Blagojevich described an approach from an associate of Senate Candidate 5: “We were approached ‘pay to play.’ That, you know, he’d raise me 500 grand. An emissary came. Then the other guy would raise a million, if I made him [Senate Candidate 5] a senator.”
Jackson said Tuesday that he met with Blagojevich Monday “for the first time in years” and voiced his desire to fill Obama’s empty Senate seat. He said he was “shocked” by Blagojevich’s arrest, adding that “if these allegations are proved true, I am outraged by the appalling, pay-to-play schemes hatched at the highest levels of our state government.”
Jackson is only one of a number of Illinois political figures whom the FBI is expected to interview in Chicago and Washington. But fellow Illinois Democratic Reps. Luis Gutierrez, Jan Schakowsky and Danny Davis, as well as Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan, all say they have not been contacted by the FBI or prosecutors in connection to the Blagojevich investigation.
Madigan has confirmed, however, that she is Senate Candidate #2 in the affidavit, but she denied having any conversations with Governor Blagojevich about the Senate seat.
There are strong indications that Candidate 1 may be Valerie Jarrett, Obama’s close confidante who has since been named a special presidential adviser. Senate Candidate 1 is identified in the federal documents as an adviser to the president-elect.
Durbin said Blagojevich was considering Jarrett until she withdrew her name from consideration. “The governor asked me if I thought she [Jarrett] was serious about not being appointed and I said, ‘yes, she told me point blank that she was,’” Durbin said.
The FBI affadavit can be read on-line or downloaded as a PDF file here.
The Truth About Affirmative Action
A Preference for Truth
Racial quotas are slowly losing their cover.
The noblest-sounding justification for racial preferences—that they lift up their beneficiaries—may soon be exposed as fraudulent. A group of law professors and economists examining the effect of law school admissions preferences on students’ bar-exam passage rates is suing the State Bar of California to obtain data for their study. The proposed research could deal a death blow to the quota regime by proving that affirmative action actually damages a student’s chances of becoming a lawyer. Predictably, the race industry has mobilized to crush the project.
Lead researcher Richard Sander has already earned the enmity of much of the law professoriate for his pioneering work on affirmative action in law schools. Almost all black students are admitted to law school with drastically lower college and LSAT grades than those of white and Asian students. After their first year of legal education, 51 percent of blacks are in the bottom tenth of their class; two-thirds are in the bottom fifth. Blacks are four times as likely as whites to fail the bar exam on their first try. Sander has drawn two conclusions from these data, first published in 2004: first, that blacks’ low qualifications entering law school predict their lagging performance in school and on the bar exam; second, that there would be more black lawyers if schools stopped extending preferences to black students—because these students would learn more in schools that matched their capabilities.
An advance guard of preference advocates furiously tried to discredit Sander’s “mismatch” hypothesis, without drawing much blood. But Sander himself admitted that the national data that he used for his 2004 study were imperfect; thus his effort to obtain the records of the California bar, which has the most extensive set of law student information in the country. It can link individual students’ college GPAs, LSAT scores, law school grades, and bar scores going back to 1973. Researchers would be able to compare, with an extraordinary degree of precision, the bar-passage rates of students admitted into elite schools via affirmative action with the rates of those with similar qualifications who attended less elite schools. When Sander and his colleagues approached the bar’s leaders and statisticians in 2005 about collaborating on a study, they got an enthusiastic response.
Then a platoon of law school deans paid the bar a little visit. Suddenly, the bar changed its tune. It threw up obstacle after obstacle, claiming that the study was an “anti-affirmative-action” ploy and would violate student privacy.
Both objections were ludicrous. Sander’s research team included skeptics of his mismatch theory as well as affirmative-action supporters, all of whom just happened to believe that any theory should be subjected to rigorous empirical testing. Sander has invited his many other critics to get involved in the study as well. His project had the backing of leading social scientists. As for privacy, only the bar’s chief researcher—who has conducted many analyses of student performance in the past without incurring any objections—would have access to students’ actual records. The research would make the data anonymous so that tracing any individual’s records would be impossible for anyone else.
Nevertheless, the legal establishment’s assault on Sander’s project continued. A group of activist law professors argued that the study would lend undue importance to the bar exam. (Law students will undoubtedly be relieved to learn of the exam’s insignificance.) A UCLA law professor launched an e-mail campaign to minority lawyers in California, portraying the research as a frightening invasion of their privacy. After a hearing process that failed to give Sander’s team any opportunity to respond to the critics’ charges, the bar’s board of governors voted in November 2007 to reject the research proposal. Sander is now suing the bar, which is a government body, under California’s public-information laws.
The racial preference regime has thrived in deliberate secrecy and duplicity, but it is gradually losing its cover. Against all expectations, Sander recently convinced the University of California that it had a legal obligation to share its records on undergraduate students’ incoming qualifications and subsequent performance. Though this data set is more generalized than what Sander seeks from the bar, it will likely buttress his mismatch theory and expose lingering preferences at the university, in violation of a 1996 voter initiative outlawing them. The lawsuit against the bar remains pending, but Sander expects to start releasing results from the UC study this fall. They promise to be explosive.
Heather Mac Donald is a contributing editor of City Journal and the John M. Olin Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Racial quotas are slowly losing their cover.
The noblest-sounding justification for racial preferences—that they lift up their beneficiaries—may soon be exposed as fraudulent. A group of law professors and economists examining the effect of law school admissions preferences on students’ bar-exam passage rates is suing the State Bar of California to obtain data for their study. The proposed research could deal a death blow to the quota regime by proving that affirmative action actually damages a student’s chances of becoming a lawyer. Predictably, the race industry has mobilized to crush the project.
Lead researcher Richard Sander has already earned the enmity of much of the law professoriate for his pioneering work on affirmative action in law schools. Almost all black students are admitted to law school with drastically lower college and LSAT grades than those of white and Asian students. After their first year of legal education, 51 percent of blacks are in the bottom tenth of their class; two-thirds are in the bottom fifth. Blacks are four times as likely as whites to fail the bar exam on their first try. Sander has drawn two conclusions from these data, first published in 2004: first, that blacks’ low qualifications entering law school predict their lagging performance in school and on the bar exam; second, that there would be more black lawyers if schools stopped extending preferences to black students—because these students would learn more in schools that matched their capabilities.
An advance guard of preference advocates furiously tried to discredit Sander’s “mismatch” hypothesis, without drawing much blood. But Sander himself admitted that the national data that he used for his 2004 study were imperfect; thus his effort to obtain the records of the California bar, which has the most extensive set of law student information in the country. It can link individual students’ college GPAs, LSAT scores, law school grades, and bar scores going back to 1973. Researchers would be able to compare, with an extraordinary degree of precision, the bar-passage rates of students admitted into elite schools via affirmative action with the rates of those with similar qualifications who attended less elite schools. When Sander and his colleagues approached the bar’s leaders and statisticians in 2005 about collaborating on a study, they got an enthusiastic response.
Then a platoon of law school deans paid the bar a little visit. Suddenly, the bar changed its tune. It threw up obstacle after obstacle, claiming that the study was an “anti-affirmative-action” ploy and would violate student privacy.
Both objections were ludicrous. Sander’s research team included skeptics of his mismatch theory as well as affirmative-action supporters, all of whom just happened to believe that any theory should be subjected to rigorous empirical testing. Sander has invited his many other critics to get involved in the study as well. His project had the backing of leading social scientists. As for privacy, only the bar’s chief researcher—who has conducted many analyses of student performance in the past without incurring any objections—would have access to students’ actual records. The research would make the data anonymous so that tracing any individual’s records would be impossible for anyone else.
Nevertheless, the legal establishment’s assault on Sander’s project continued. A group of activist law professors argued that the study would lend undue importance to the bar exam. (Law students will undoubtedly be relieved to learn of the exam’s insignificance.) A UCLA law professor launched an e-mail campaign to minority lawyers in California, portraying the research as a frightening invasion of their privacy. After a hearing process that failed to give Sander’s team any opportunity to respond to the critics’ charges, the bar’s board of governors voted in November 2007 to reject the research proposal. Sander is now suing the bar, which is a government body, under California’s public-information laws.
The racial preference regime has thrived in deliberate secrecy and duplicity, but it is gradually losing its cover. Against all expectations, Sander recently convinced the University of California that it had a legal obligation to share its records on undergraduate students’ incoming qualifications and subsequent performance. Though this data set is more generalized than what Sander seeks from the bar, it will likely buttress his mismatch theory and expose lingering preferences at the university, in violation of a 1996 voter initiative outlawing them. The lawsuit against the bar remains pending, but Sander expects to start releasing results from the UC study this fall. They promise to be explosive.
Heather Mac Donald is a contributing editor of City Journal and the John M. Olin Fellow at the Manhattan Institute.
Locked Down: Martial Law In America
This documentary will and should scare the hell out of you. This is coming the time to prepare is now. (4 parts)
Monday, December 8, 2008
Extensive List of Banned Books
Not all of these books are banned however most of them are quite rare and won't be found at your local library. Knowledge is power.
100 Documents on the Origin of the War (German White Book) 13.4MB
Andrew MacDonald - Hunter Another version below under "Hunter"
Andrew MacDonald - Turner Diaries Another version below under "Turner Diaries"
Animal Farm (George Orwell)
Antichrist (Nietzsche, 1895 tran. by Menken, 1920)
Assault on the Liberty (James M. Ennes, Jr., 1979) 12MB
Beast as Saint (Michael "Martin Luther" King expose)
Beria (1-page advertisement from the National Alliance)
Best of Attack and National Vanguard (National Alliance, 1984) 63MB
Big Book of Racialism (DOC file)
Blood and Soil (Anna Bramwell, 1985) A sympathetic study of Richard Walter Darre, the Nazi Agriculture Minister
Bolshevism from Moses to Lenin
Book of the Dead 26.4MB
British Guardian (9/1924, pub. by The Britons)
British Guardian (1/9/1925, pub. by The Britons)
Civil War Two (Thomas W. Chittum)
Cracks in the Constitution (mht file)
Death of a City (Michael McLaughlin)
Denying the Holocaust (Deborah Lipstadt)
Design of the Universe (Fritz Kahn, 1954) 40.5MB
Did Six Million Really Die? [ Compressed-page version ]
Enemy of Europe Yockey
Facts in the Case (Gov. Alfred E. Smith)
Facts the Government and Media Don't Want You to Know
Fame of a Dead Man's Deeds [ Compressed-page version ]
FBI MCSOT Terrorist Flyer: FRONT BACK
First They Came for the Arabs...
Forced War - When Peaceful Revision Failed (David Hoggan, 1961)
Freedom From War - Disarmament
From Major Jordan's Diaries 19.5MB
Germany's Hitler (Heinz A. Heinz) 11MB
Gothic Ripples (2/1988)
Gothic Ripples reprint (1986)
Gun Control in National Socialist Germany (Dr. William Pierce)
Hitler We Loved and Why (RTF)
Hoax of the Twentieth Century (2003) 13.2MB
Holy Book of Adolf Hitler (James Larratt Battersby, 1952)
Hussein - Ambassador Glaspie Interview
Icebreaker - Who Started the Second World War? (Viktor Suvorov, 1990)
Illuminati Proof of Conspiracy (Robison, 1798)
Imperium (Francis Parker Yockey; Intro by Prof. Oliver)
Impossible Dream (Heaton, 1990) 30MB
Inside Story of the Peace Conference (Dr. E.J. Dillon, 1920) 24.3MB
Jew as Criminal (Keller and Andersen, 1937; intro by Streicher)
Jewish Genocide of Armenian Christians (Bjerknes, 2006)
Jewish History, Jewish Religion
Jewish Religion and Its Influence Today (Elizabeth Dilling) [ HTML hot-linked version ] [ regular text PDF ]
Jews (Hilaire Belloc, 1922)
Jews and Their Lies (Martin Luther)
Johannes Buxtorf Ch. 36 of The Jewish Synagogue on the Messiah from a 1657 English edition (with facsimiles)
Judaism in Music (Richard Wagner)
Judea Declares War on Germany (Barnes Review 2001)
Johann Andreas Eisenmenger, sein Werk und dessen Wirkung (1997)
Last Days of the Romanovs 16MB (another version, 7MB)
Latvia: Year of Horror 6.8MB
Lectures on the Holocaust (Germar Rudolf) 13.8MB
Leif Eriksson (German)
Life in the Third Reich (a speech by Friedrich Kurreck)
Made in Russia - the Holocaust (Carlos Porter) 18.3MB Better quality version is in HTML at the CWPorter Mirror (two2.htm)
Magna Carta This version has the Jew clauses, later redacted!
McCarthy and his Enemies (William F. Buckley, Jr.) 21.8MB
Mein Kampf - The Bible of the White Nationalist Movement
Why the Martin Luther King, Jr. Holiday Should be Repealed (Mark Farrell)
Murder of Little Mary Phagan (Mary Phagan [grandniece], 1987)
Nameless War (A.H.M. Ramsay) The author was imprisoned for his views under Regulation 18b
New Order of Barbarians (tape transcriptions, Lawrence Dunegan and Randy Engel)
Occult Theocrasy (Lady Queenborough aka Edith Starr Miller) 10MB
One Sheaf, One Vine (Robert S. Griffin, 2004)
Origin of the Palestine-Israel Conflict
Origins of the Second World War (A.J.P. Taylor)
Origins of Christianity (Revilo P. Oliver)
Pasque di Sangue (in the original Italian) 13.7MB
Poisonous Mushroom (the Jew!) (Ernst Hiemer, with graphics)
Prominent False Witness: Elie Wiesel (Robert Faurisson, IHR, 1999). Includes Elie Wiesel: Messenger To All Humanity (L.A. Rollins, IHR, 1985)
Propaganda (Edward L. Bernays, 1928) from the father of "PR" (i.e., clever lying to serve a hidden agenda)
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Prussianism and Socialism (Oswald Spengler)
Queen Isabella includes material from William Thomas Walsh re. medieval Spanish Jews
Race and Reality (Carlton Putnam, 1967)
Race and Reason (Carlton Putnam, 1961)
Reds in America (R.M. Whitney, 1924) 17.4MB
Reichstag Fire (Fritz Tobias, 1964)
Revolt Against the Modern World (Julius Evola, 1969/95) 18MB
Ritual Murder - Myth or Reality?
Saddam Hussein (Nita M. Renfrew) 12.1MB
Saint Einstein 17.4MB
Secrets of the Federal Reserve (Eustace Mullins) [ another version ]
Silent Jew - The Timmerman Controversy
Six Million Reconsidered Vol. 1 (ed. by William N. Grimstad)
Slavery - What Really Happened
Special Treatment (Carlo Mattogno, 2004) 6.9MB
SS Race Theory and Mate Selection Guidelines
Stuka Pilot (Hans Ulrich Rudel) [ another version ]
Taguba Report (ZIP file)
Take Your Choice - Separation or Mongrelization (Theodore G. Bilbo, 1946)
They Dare to Speak Out (Paul Findley, 1985/9) 18MB
This Time the World (George Lincoln Rockwell) [ another version ]
Truth About 9-11 (Rev. Dr. Matt Hale)
Ultimate Solution (Eric Norden, 1973) Premise: All Jews have been annihilated from the Earth by the world-victorious Axis. Then evidence turns up that there is still a Jew alive in New York City. NY cops have to hunt him down. Unfortunately, the Nazis are shown here as homosexual (?!), but there's enough non-PC stuff going on here to keep it interesting.
Understanding Jurisdiction (DOC file)
Varange - The Life and Thought of Francis Parker Yockey (K.R. Bolton, 1998)
War is a Racket (USMC Maj. Gen. Smedley Butler)
White Power (George Lincoln Rockwell)
Who We Are (William Luther Pierce) A series of articles on the history of the White race
Women of the Far Right (Glen Jeansonne, 1996)
When Victims Rule 13.5MB
You Gentiles (Maurice Samuel)
You Shall Know Them by their Works and Words (Free Republic)
West, War and Islam (Ernst Zuendel)
Zebra - Black on White Hate Crimes in San Francisco (Clark Howard, 1979) 15MB
Zweites Buch (The Second Book of Adolf Hitler - sequel to Mein Kampf)
Friday, December 5, 2008
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Hawaii Hospitals Confirm Barack Hussein Wasn't Born There!
Currently, there are 16 cases in 12 states (with 2 before the Supreme Court) contending that Barack Obama is constitutionally ineligible to be sworn in as President of the United States.
Click below - lengthy post
Coming out of Chicago, 2 years 9 months ago, a 26 page report on the importance of getting rid of the natural born citizen clause of the Constitution
Quote:
Sarah P. Herlihy is employed by Kirkland & Ellis LLP http://www.kirkland.com . Note: this law firm is based in Chicago.
Bruce I. Ettelson, P.C. (aka PARTNER), is a Member of the finance committees for both U.S. Senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin.Not the only partner with ties to their Harvard Senator. Chicago law firm... US Senators for Illinois... yeah, easy link.
Now, we can get into the new affidavits, or testimonies of ambassadors, or forensic experts that go under the psuedonym Dr Ron Polarik, but really, why bother? No one wants to send a guy guilty of forging a US birth certificate to jail for 15 years. Instead, lets focus on how in 2006, Obama's buddies felt it necessary to put together a 26 page dissertation why the "natural born" clause is the "stupidest provision."
Kirkland's specialty?
Quote:
Kirkland & Ellis has a 100-year history of providing exceptional service to clients around the world in complex litigation, corporate and tax, intellectual property, restructuring and counseling matters. The groundwork has been established for another century of superior legal work and client service. Where do they mention Constitutional law? Perhaps under "Other"...
The story that Atlas broke:
July 4, 2008 EXCLUSIVE: Atlas Tech Expert Declares Obama Birth Certificate Forgery
July 11, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FORENSIC EXPERT: "the [birth] certificate is still a horrible forgery"
July 20, 2008 ATLAS EXCLUSIVE: FINAL REPORT ON OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE FORGERY CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN
Duo take Obama birth challenge to Court
[§338-17.8] Certificates for children born out of State. (a) Upon application of an adult or the legal parents of a minor child, the director of health shall issue a birth certificate for such adult or minor, provided that proof has been submitted to the director of health that the legal parents of such individual while living without the Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.
What Exactly is the Hub Bub Page.(hat tip Larwyn)
|
|
Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis |
AmericansLegal Actions Across America:
|
Pennsylvania Case in Supreme Court now! |
California Case |
|
New Jersey Case in Supreme Court now! | California Case |
| Connecticut Case in Supreme Court now! |
|
|
Hawaii Case | Georgia Case |
|
North Carolina Class Action Case |
|
|
|
Ohio Case |
| ?Unconfirmed reports Florida Case |
Washington Case |
| ?Unconfirmed reports Utah Case |
|
| ?Unconfirmed reports Wyoming Case |
Carol Greenberg 
Other cases that weren't cases:
| Lan Lamphere Patriot Brigade Case | David Archbold California Case |
| Wild Bill UPDATE 11/19 Virginia Case | Dan Smith UPDATE 11/18 New York Case |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)